In a motion filed by the Los Angeles federal court, the Trump Justice Department is revoking the “Flores consent order.” Attorney General Pam Bondi believes the ordinance is incentivizing illegal immigrants on the southern border.
Flores's decree has ruled the detention and release of immigrant children since 1997. The motion was filed by the Department of Justice and granted by the HHS and the Department of Homeland Security, requiring the federal court in Southern California to dissolve the ordinance.
Biden-appointed federal judge keeps blocking Trump administrators from providing lawyer funding for immigrant children
However, a motion to terminate the Flores statute will be held in Los Angeles, U.S. District Court Judge Dolly Gee, at a July 18 hearing. Judge Gee has presided over the case for many years and she is unlikely to agree to get rid of Flores's statutes and finally bring a possible battle in the Federal Court of Appeal and Supreme Court.
Attorney General Pam Bondi believes the ordinance is incentivizing illegal immigrants on the southern border. (Anna Moneymaker)
“The outdated Flores consent decrease was implemented as a stopgap measure almost 30 years ago but in recent years has directly incentivized illegal immigration at our southern border. Congress and various federal agencies have already solved the problems that Flores was designed to fix, and this consent decrease is now an unacceptable restriction on our America-first immigration agenta,” said Attorney General Pam Bondi in a statement to Fox News.
Federal Judge Bucks Trump Administrator Delays Dismissal of MS-13 Leader
Justice Department officials also told Fox News that the idea was to put power in the hands of elected officials in Washington rather than a federal judge in California.
The Justice Department said in its filing: “The Government is moving,” completely terminated the FSA and terminated the FSA in all defendants and dissolved the court's arrest, handling, handling, caring, caring, caring, caring, caring, caring, care, care, care, guardianship of minors from foreign countries… After 40 years of litigation and 28 years of judicial litigation and 28 years of judicial control, to stay away from the judicial elements of the region, so that the final international scope of the case is 100 miles, which is a 100 miles international outlook than 100 miles internationally.
Justice Department officials also told Fox News that the idea was to put power in the hands of elected officials in Washington rather than a federal judge in California. (Ting Shen/Bloomberg via Getty Images)
More information about submitting documents:
In view of the significant changes in the Court's entry into the FSA 28 years ago, including the enactment of regulations that incorporate FSA's goals and the Supreme Court precedent that is inconsistent with such a long-term statute, further continuation of the FSA is no longer fair or public interest.
Trump Justice Department lowers legal challenges to Texas Border Security Act in the Biden era
The court entered the FSA in 1997 as a consent ordinance and revised it in December 2001. Despite interventions in U.S. Congress and institutional regulations, the FSA has ruled over the care and custody of unaccompanied foreign children (UACs). In 2015, the Court extended the FSA to accompanying children, see Flores v. Lynch, 828 F.3d 898, 906, 909 (9thCir. 2016), although it is obvious from the FSA's provisions that the parties did not take into account their inclusion. Thus, in the case of accompanying children, while consent forms provide a basis for regional commission supervision, national policies have long been formulated by the district courts (rather than the president or Congress). That can't be done at all.
Judge Gee has presided over the case for many years and she is unlikely to agree to get rid of Flores's statutes and finally bring a possible battle in the Federal Court of Appeal and Supreme Court. (Drew Angerer/Getty Images)
During the 28 years that the court controlled federal policy, a huge fundamental change occurred regarding the custody of alien children who had no immigration status in the United States: the emergence of foreigners has entered the United States, between entry ports on the southwestern border, including a large number of foreigners, including voluntary surrenders to the Border Patrol-Repressor-Surildian Patrol population planners; the demographics of aliens arriving at the border have shifted, including countries outside the Western Hemisphere and the population of more children. The global pandemic requires governments to use their deportation mandates to protect public health; the subsequent lifting of policies has led to more than two years of immigration policy turmoil.
Executives were unable to respond adequately and meaningfully to these changes, as the FSA abandoned federal immigration policy.
Click here to get the Fox News app
The successive government has tried to fail to successfully get rid of the consent order and the court's cover-up. However, the detention of teenage foreigners (more than one generation) remains due to restrictions in the 1997 agreement.
