Moderate Republicans and tough conservatives in the House are increasingly opposed to the Senate version of the “big and beautiful bill,” just days before the lower chambers of commerce will consider legislation, a daunting dynamic for Republican leaders as they compete for Friday’s self-imposed deadline.
The Senate began its hours-long vote on Monday, with members considering a series of amendments that could be a series of amendments supported in the lower room, including changes to Medicaid cuts and tax regulations. The House of Lords is expected to vote on the last pass in the early hours of Tuesday.
As House members watched the Senate’s deliberation anxiously, they were confused about the situation of legislation.
A moderate House Republican asked to discuss private conversations anonymously, “On the phone link, on the phone, everyone was complaining.” “People would say some very positive rules, but no one was happy with the Senate version.”
“It’s amazing for many of us – how does it get so bad?” they added.
Real-time update: Senate debate Trump debates in hours-long vote
Lawmakers say Republican leaders and the White House are calling on suspicious Republicans, and members of more conservative districts are asking questions about the moderates — highlighting the depth of concerns in the meeting.
On the hill, at least six moderate House Republicans plan to vote on the Senate bill in their current form as they fear changes in Medicaid and rollbacks of green energy tax credits, among other provisions.
The Senate bill includes a proposal that will effectively pay provider tax rates by 3.5% in 2031, down from the current 6%, but only applies to states that expand Medicaid under the Affordable Care Act. On the Green Energy Tax Credit, the amount of rollbacks subsidized in the Senate bill is smaller, but if a percentage of its parts come from China, the upper chamber version will increase the new tax on solar and wind projects.
Rep. David Vallador (R-Calif.), Jeff van Drew (RN.J.) and Young King (R-Calif.) are currently the “no” of the legislation because of these provisions, in addition to two other Big Moderate Republicans, who requested anonymous discussion of their opinions on the bill. Meanwhile, Rep. Nick Lalota (RN.Y.) said he opposed the Senate’s cut bill due to language involving state and local tax (salt) deductions.
“I think it’s just bad public policy,” Van Drew said earlier this month after the Senate unveiled its language. “If you hurt these hospitals, some people will close, and some people will have to make more use of the emergency room. … It’s political stupidity; it’s political suicide.”
Currently, moderates are closely following a vote for an amendment proposed by Senator Rick Scott (R-FLA.) that will prevent new enrollees in Medicaid expansion status from getting 9 to 1 enhanced federal medical assistance percentage (FMAP) if they are invalid, if they do not have children raised and do not have children dependent on them, and this change will cut by the $313 Social Security Network program.
The amendment is unlikely to receive enough support to pass, although Senate Majority Leader John Thun (Rss.d.) is supporting the change as part of the deal to help Scott and other Republicans conduct procedural votes on Saturday.
Meanwhile, moderates in the House quietly hope that this adjustment will indeed squeak as it will cause the package to die in the house. Many members of the House of Commons said the provision was a red line for them.
“Most of us want to pass the FMAP Amendment, so it will be the last nail in the coffin,” said the lawmaker previously cited.
On the other side of the ideological range, conservative Republicans are angry at the bill’s spending cut levels, resulting in its deficit impact. The conservative House Liberty Caucus, including several critics of the bill, fired a shot on Monday.
“The housing budget framework is clear: There is no new deficit spending in a beautiful bill. The Senate version adds a $651 billion deficit, which is nearly double the total before interest costs,” the group wrote on social platform X. This is not a financial responsibility. This is not what we agree with. ”
“The Senate must make major changes, at least within the scope of compliance with the agreed housing budget framework,” it added. “The Republicans must do better.”
Rep. Chip Roy (R-Texas), one of the most vocal members of the group, expressed concern over the bill throughout the weekend, saying he had been in conversation with the White House – he called it a “fever fellowship,” but the discussions didn’t seem to be doing enough to bring him onto the ship.
“I know the president has a great agenda that can make things move again. I want to speed up that. I want border money. I want to vote yes, but I can’t vote yes, just because they say I have to do it.” “I can’t vote yes, just because everyone says we have to do it by July 4. It’s my responsibility to look at this objectively and say, are you doing the right math? I’ll tell you now, I don’t think math is right now.”
Rep. Keith Self, another member of the group, sounded similar notes, said he wanted the Senate to return to the house framework – a vote against procedural rules when the measure operates through the House.
“I think the commitment is back to the housing framework,” Self said. “That’s what everyone is committed to, and I know that’s what the speakers have been talking to the Senate Majority Leader, so we’ll see what happens.”
Worries on both ends of the Republican meeting are becoming increasingly apparent as Republican leaders arrive on Friday with their self-implemented July 4 deadline to complete the work on the packaging under pressure from President Trump.
Once the arduous voting process is over, the Senate is expected to hold a final vote on legislation early Tuesday morning. If the bill passes, the House Rules Committee can call legislation as early as noon Tuesday, and according to sources, panelists were told to initiate the process in the lower meeting room. The House Majority Whip Tom Emmer (R-Minn.) office told lawmakers Sunday night that floor tickets could be held as early as 9 a.m. on Wednesday.
Some MPs are on strike as leaders ploughed at full speed, suggesting that the party postpone its timeline to continue deliberations.
“So we should have a conversation with the Senate, but we should have a conversation with the Senate, look at their work, review the bills, find out where we can find savings, find where we can adjust our work on tax policies and actually make that map actually add up,” Roy said Monday.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. The material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
For the latest news, weather, sports and streaming videos, head to the mountain.
